 Original Innovation
 Open access
 Published:
Methodology for calculating load capacity reduction and slip relationship of clustered group nail connectors
Advances in Bridge Engineering volume 5, Article number: 7 (2024)
Abstract
Clustered group nail connectors are key connecting components for the full lifecycle construction and safe operation of steel–concrete composite structural bridges. To thoroughly investigate the stress mechanism of clustered group nail connectors in steel–concrete composite structures, this paper conducts a detailed numerical analysis on 100 sets of such connectors. It analyzes the stress mechanism of individual nail connectors and quantitatively calculates the group nail effect under the coupled action of multiple factors (nail spacing between layers, number of nail layers, concrete strength). Based on clarifying the force transmission patterns of nails and concrete in different layers during the loading process, this paper proposes a method for calculating the average bearing capacity reduction coefficient and the loadslip curve of single nails in clustered group nail connectors under the coupled action of multiple factors, which has been validated by experimental data. This research provides a theoretical basis for the design and calculation of group nail connectors in steel–concrete composite structural bridges.
1 Introduction
Shear connectors play a crucial role in steel–concrete composite beams, where they are responsible for transferring longitudinal shear forces between the steel beam and the bridge deck (Wang et al. 2019a; Classen 2018; Yang et al. 2018). The effective combination of steel and concrete is a key factor in ensuring the safe operation of composite structural bridges (Zhang et al. 2023a, 2023b). Among various types of shear connectors, nail connectors are widely used due to their ease of welding and excellent mechanical properties, making them a superior type of flexible shear connector (Wei et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2018). Particularly in steel trussconcrete composite beams, where the contact surface area between the steel truss's upper chord and concrete is relatively small, it necessitates concentrating multiple nails in a limited area, thus forming clustered group nail connectors (Shi 2021). These group nail locations may be subjected to extreme shear forces, therefore, comprehensive and detailed research on the loadbearing performance of clustered group nail connectors is especially important. Wuhu Yangtze River Bridge is China's pioneering composite bridge, featuring prestressed concrete bridge panels and steel girders. Embracing the development concept of bridge industrialization and the trend of structural assembly, China has successfully constructed a multitude of prefabricated steel–concrete composite bridges, exemplified by the Hong KongZhuhaiMacao Bridge. Extensive research has demonstrated that densely arranged cluster nailing joints exhibit distinct mechanical properties compared to single nailing. The force distribution among shear nails is nonuniform, resulting in a notable group nailing effect across all stud layers. The average loadcarrying capacity of intensive cluster nailing is lower than that of single nailing (Xu et al. 2012). However, the current "Steel Structure Design Standard" (GB500172017) (Tong 2019) does not specify any reduction in shear bearing capacity for studs influenced by the group nail effect. Consequently, designing based on the calculation formula for single nails may compromise safety standards. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct a comprehensive study on uneven load transfer between layers of clustered nail joints and establish principles governing reductions in shear bearing capacity. These findings will provide valuable guidance for practical engineering design.
In response to the impact of the group nail effect on bearing capacity reduction, the academic community has proposed various calculation methods. For instance, (Zhou et al. 2014) Zhou et al. analyzed the force characteristics of steel anchor box group nail shear connectors through several finite element models and proposed a formula for the reduction coefficient of shear bearing capacity considering the group nail effect (Deng et al. 2022). Deng et al., through the analysis of 10 pushout specimens and 25 finite element models, found that the loadslip curves of clustered connectors are longer than those of individual nail connectors, with uneven shear forces between the nails and the average shear bearing capacity varying with the spacing and arrangement of nails (Ding et al. 2021). Ding et al. investigated composite nail connectors in Ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) and found that the nail diameter significantly affects shear performance, while a reduced spacing between nails diminishes performance (Fang et al. 2022). Fang et al. conducted a static analysis of shear connectors in steelprecast UHPC composite structures, explored the impact of nail diameter and plate thickness on shear bearing capacity, and proposed a more accurate strength calculation formula (Zhang et al. 2020). Zhang et al. experimentally investigated the shear resistance of longitudinal doublerow nails in selfcompacting concrete beams and developed corresponding bearing capacity formulas (Wang et al. 2019b). Although existing research provides quantitative analysis methods for the group nail effect, most national standards, including China's 'Design Code for Steel–Concrete Composite Bridges' (Tong et al. 2020; (GB/T 10433–2003), largely do not incorporate the group nail effect in calculations. The reduction coefficients in current standards, mainly based on (Okada et al. 2006) Okada's research, consider only the spacing between nails and the strength of concrete, neglecting the layers of nails along the direction of shear action. This omission could lead to significant errors in estimating the bearing capacity of group nail connectors with multiple layers of nails, impacting practical engineering applications.
Current research commonly employs finite element software to establish numerical models, combined with results from pushout tests, for a comprehensive analysis of the shear bearing capacity and load–displacement behavior of nail connectors. For instance, Yu et al. (Yu et al. 2020) used a refined threedimensional nonlinear finite element model to investigate the mechanical behavior of grouped nail shear connectors embedded in hybrid fiber reinforced concrete (HFRC). Shi et al. (Shi and Fan 2022), through finite element model analysis of prefabricatedassembly group nail shear keys, compared the mechanical properties of single and double key groups, thereby deriving a formula for the reduction coefficient of the bearing capacity of multiple key groups. Wang et al. (Wang et al. 2021a) investigated the interaction between nails and UHPC through validation of finite element models and proposed a formula for predicting the shear bearing capacity of nails. Xu et al. (Xu et al. 2022) explored the shear resistance of nail and PBL connectors based on finite element models. Ding et al. (Ding et al. 2017) established detailed finite element models through reverse pushout tests to assess structural shear resistance. Wang et al. (Wang et al. 2021b) used threedimensional nonlinear finite element models to investigate the multibolt effect. However, in the actual engineering design and calculation of steel trussconcrete composite beams, it is necessary to use the loadslip curves of the connectors. Although many standards specify methods for calculating the bearing capacity of nail connectors, they do not provide standard loadslip relationships. Engineers often rely on regression analysis of experimental data or use relationship formulas proposed by other scholars for calculations. For densely arranged clustered group nail connectors, their mechanical properties significantly differ from those of individual nail connectors. When there are multiple layers of nails in the group nail connectors, their initial shear stiffness may experience some reduction. In such cases, using relationship formulas designed for individual nail connectors might overestimate the shear stiffness of group nail connectors, thereby affecting the accuracy of the design.
This paper builds on existing research and uses the finite element simulation method for pushout specimens, comprehensively considering the effects of nail spacing between layers, the number of layers, and concrete strength on the reduction effect of shear bearing capacity. Through regression analysis, a formula for calculating the reduction coefficient of the average bearing capacity of a single nail is derived, and an applicable loadslip relationship expression for clustered group nail connectors is proposed. These achievements not only enrich the theoretical foundation in the field of group nail connectors but also provide an important reference for practical engineering applications.
2 Simulation model
2.1 Finite element model building
2.1.1 Finite element pushout test design
In this paper, we utilized the largescale spatial finite element software ANSYS 2021 to construct a numerical model of the pushout test. The simulation results were compared with experimental results from other researchers in existing literature to verify the accuracy of the established numerical model. In addition, we conducted a detailed analysis of the force conditions of group nail connectors in the pushout test. The design of the specimens referenced the standard specimen form proposed in the European Code (EC4) (EUROCODE 2004), with adjustments made to the dimensions to accommodate the arrangement of group nails, as shown in Fig. 1.
The pushout test specimen consists of an Ibeam, to the outer surfaces of which nails are welded, and concrete is poured to encase the nails. For materials, Q345qD grade steel was used for the Ibeam, and ML15 material for the nails. The size and related requirements of the welding nails were chosen according to the Chinese standard GB/T 10433–2002 (GB/T 10433–2003). In the finite element model, nails and Ibeams were simulated using 3D 8node solid elements SOLID 45, with three degrees of freedom. Concrete was modeled using SOLID 65 elements, which can simulate reinforced concrete structures with cracking and crushing capabilities, and can mimic the behavior of steel bars in concrete. Ordinary reinforcement bars and stirrups in concrete were simulated using LINK 8 elements, which are 3D truss elements capable of bearing tension and compression but not bending.
The meshing of the model was done flexibly, with densification in key areas and complex shapes, such as at the connection of the nails and the steel plate, and the holes in the concrete slab, where the mesh size was reduced to as small as 1 mm. The mesh size in other parts was kept above 10 mm. Due to the model's biaxial symmetry, only 1/4 of the model was established, and symmetric constraints were applied at the symmetry plane. The mesh division of the model is shown in Fig. 2.
Using the aforementioned numerical simulation method, a model of the pushout specimen for clustered group nail connectors was established. In the process of setting up the numerical simulation model, three major factors significantly affecting the group nail effect were primarily considered: the spacing between the layers of nails (n_{r}), the number of nail layers (n_{d}), and the strength grade of concrete (f_{ck}). Various combinations of these factors resulted in a total of 100 numerical simulation models, as shown in Table 1. For ease of description, we have assigned codes to the three parameters of nail connectors: the number of nail layers, the spacing between nail layers, and the concrete strength. For instance, '6R5DC30' refers to a clustered group nail connector with 6 layers of nails (6R), a nail layer spacing of five times the nail diameter (5D), and using concrete grade C30.
2.1.2 The selection of constitutive relation
The specimen's stud is made of ML15 steel in accordance with specification requirements, featuring a yield strain ε_{y} = 0.002, yield strength f_{y} = 420 MPa, ultimate strain ε_{u} = 0.063, and ultimate strength f_{u} = 495 MPa. The Q345 steel has a yield strength f_{y} = 345 MPa and an ultimate strength f_{u} = 480 MPa. In the finite element model, the constitutive relationship of materials is described using bilinear followup strengthening model BKIN and Mises yield criterion with two broken lines having different slopes. The ordinary steel bar used in concrete is HRB335 grade steel bar with ideal elastic–plastic material properties featuring a yield strength f_{y} = 335 MPa as shown in Fig. 3.
2.1.3 Simulation of contact relationship between steel and concrete
The model takes into account the friction between the stud and concrete, as well as between the steel beam and concrete. The contact behavior is simulated using the TARGE170 target unit and CONTA175 contact unit, with a friction factor of 0.4. Since the bond between steel and concrete fails at failure time, it is not considered, and the contact gap is closed using element option. In practical engineering, bolts and steel beams are typically connected through welding. In this model, however, the studs and steel beams are treated as a tightly connected entity. When establishing the numerical model, separate mesh models for perforated steel beams and studs are first created respectively. Then, the studs are embedded in predrilled holes of the steel beams while merging repeated nodes to ensure their connection as a whole.
2.1.4 Failure pattern of stud connectors
According to numerous experimental studies and numerical simulation tests, it has been observed that there are two primary failure modes of stud connectors: concrete damage and stud failure.
The failure of concrete typically occurs when its strength is relatively weaker compared to the material strength of the stud. Concrete failure mainly manifests in two forms: compression failure and splitting failure. During the pushout test, significant compressive stress is exerted by the stud on the concrete in front of the loading direction. This stress primarily concentrates near the root of the stud, eventually leading to localized crushing or splitting of concrete in that region. Shear failure is commonly encountered as a mode of stud failure. When the material strength of the stud is comparatively lower than that of concrete, shear failures occur due to substantial shear forces acting on the root area of studs. Additionally, other types of damage may also arise including weld damage, steel beam base metal damage, and bolt pulling out damage; these should be avoided during design and construction processes. Poor welding quality can result in premature fracture at welds before reaching material strength while good welding quality leads to shear failures within studs themselves. Increasing lengthtodiameter ratio for studs can help prevent pullout damages.
2.2 Finite element analysis model verification
2.2.1 Shear bearing capacity and loadslip curve
The results obtained by the finite element model will be verified in this section. The parameters and test sources of the selected specimens are presented in reference (Luo 2008; Li 2015; Zhang 2021; Lin and Liu 2015). The numerical model was established based on the modeling method described in Sect. 2.1 of this paper. The material size and parameters of the model were all referenced from Table 1, while the loadslip curve of the specimen was extracted and compared with test data from reference (Huang 2015; Xu 2013) for validation purposes. The corresponding results are presented in Fig. 4.
As can be seen from Fig. 4, the loadslip curve obtained by the numerical simulation test in this paper is in good agreement with the test results, and there is no significant deviation in the curve during the loading process, which indicates that the numerical simulation model established in this paper can accurately simulate the test process of connector ejection.
3 The force mechanism of clustered group nail connectors
3.1 The group nail effect of clustered group nail connectors
Clustered group nail connectors exhibit significant differences in mechanical performance compared to traditional connectors with uniformly distributed individual nails, mainly due to the socalled 'group nail effect'. During the loading process, the distribution of loads among the nails in different layers of group nail connectors is uneven. This results in a reduction in both shear stiffness and shearbearing capacity compared to singlerow nail connectors. Particularly in the failure stage, group nail connectors may exhibit a cascading failure effect similar to 'falling dominoes' (Lian 2015).
3.1.1 Loadslip relationship under group nailing effect
Figure 5 presents the loadslip curves of pushout specimen models with different numbers of nail layers, based on specific model parameters (nail diameter 22 mm, nail height 200 mm, layer spacing 5D, i.e., five times the nail diameter). This curve clearly reveals the two main stages in the loading process of the nail connectors: the elastic stage and the elastoplastic stage. In the initial phase of loading, the curve exhibits a linear trend, indicating small slip amounts and suggesting that the material of the connector is in the elastic state. As the loading continues, the connector gradually enters the elastoplastic stage. The rate of increase in slip amount accelerates, and although the connector has not yet reached the yield point, it already exhibits certain ductile characteristics.
3.1.2 Reduction of load bearing capacity of group nail connectors
By synthesizing experimental data from multiple scholars (Deng et al. 2022; Su et al. 2014), we have compiled information on the average shear bearing capacity and shear stiffness of individual nails in Table 2, and conducted a comparative analysis with clustered group nail connectors. It is observed that the average bearing capacity of individual nails in clustered group nail connectors significantly decreases compared to individual nail connectors, and this decrease is positively correlated with the number of nail layers. Specifically, as the number of nail layers increases, the reduction in the average shear bearing capacity of individual nails gradually intensifies. Similarly, the shear stiffness of group nail connectors also decreases with an increase in the number of nail layers.
3.1.3 Mechanical characteristics of group nail connectors
In the experiment, the loading point is located at the top of the steel beam, and the vertical force F is applied to the top of the steel beam, causing shear forces at the base of the nails in the concrete. This shear force is transmitted to the concrete in the form of a vertical force. The lower end of the concrete is constrained, and under the action of shear force in the nails and the bonding force with the steel beam, it undergoes certain compressive deformation. Since the bottom end of the steel beam is not constrained, there is no vertical compression deformation, causing the distances between the welding points of each layer of nails and the distances between the nail heads to be unequal. This results in a certain 'archshaped' deformation of the steel plate, where the deformation of the steel plate leads to the nails bearing a portion of additional force, resulting in a decrease in shear force in the upper nails and an increase in shear force in the lower nails, as shown in Fig. 6.
Using ANSYS 2020, the shear forces borne by each layer of nails in each loading stage are calculated. Taking the example of a 7layer clustered group nail connector with a diameter of 19 mm and a height of 200 mm, by selecting all the nodes at the bottom of the nails in the solid model and calculating the sum of the forces in the ydirection, the shear force value borne by each nail is obtained. Figure 7 shows the load values borne by each row of nails at different stages.It can be noted that from top to bottom, the shear force values borne by the nails first decrease and then increase, exhibiting a 'saddleshaped' distribution. The bottom layer of nails bears the maximum shear force, which is consistent with the analytical results of the 'archshaped deformation' theory. Therefore, the bottom layer of nails is the first to shear during failure.
Furthermore, in the initial loading stage, the uneven distribution of forces among the nails in each layer is high, but as the load increases, the forces among the nails in each layer tend to become more uniform. For example, at a load of 0.2P, the sum of the shear forces borne by the first, sixth, and seventh layers of nails compared to the sum of the shear forces borne by all layers of nails shows that 42% of the nails bear 48% of the overall shear force, indicating a relatively uneven force distribution."
The unevenness coefficient is introduced to quantitatively describe the unevenness of the forces on each layer of nails in the clustered group nail connector. This paper adopts the method from reference (Li 2017), leveraging the calculation principle of the Gini coefficient G, to define a method suitable for calculating the unevenness of the forces on each layer of nails. The arrangement of each layer of stud in ascending order according to the load borne is illustrated in Fig. 8.The horizontal axis represents the cumulative proportion of the number of stud layers, while the vertical axis represents the cumulative load proportion corresponding to the cumulative number of layers, with each point being connected. η denotes the ratio between the area of part B and the sum of areas for parts A and B in the Fig. 8.
The unevenness coefficient for the clustered group nail connector is calculated at five load levels. Taking examples of 5R6DC50, 5R8DC50, as well as 7R5DC40, and 7R5DC50, the variation curves are plotted, as shown in Fig. 9. In the stages before 0.6P, due to the delayed transmission of the load, the nails at the loading end bear a larger load, and the distribution of forces on the nails along the shear direction shows a 'saddleshaped' pattern. When the load reaches 0.8P, as the volume of the material in the plastic stage continues to increase, the stress redistribution effect becomes more pronounced. At this point, the forces on each layer of nails are generally uniform, with the layer experiencing the maximum force located on the side away from the loading end.
3.2 The force transmission mechanism of clustered group nail connectors
3.2.1 Loadslip relationship under group nailing effect
During the loading process of the specimen, the concrete region near the base of the bolts experiences high triaxial compressive stress. Shear, bending moment, and eccentric normal forces reach equilibrium at a certain distance from the steel–concrete interface. Taking a 22 mm diameter, 5D spacing, and 7layer clustered group nail connector as an example, Fig. 10(a) shows the front view of the principal stress cloud. The gray area indicates the concrete reaching the limit of principal compressive stress in that region and being crushed. As the load increases, the load is gradually transmitted from the top layer of bolts to the bottom layer of bolts. Due to the restraint at the bottom of the concrete, the gray stress area of the bottom layer of bolts increases accordingly. Figure 10(b) is the profile principal stress cloud map of the concretebolt axis. The contour lines of vertical stress on the bolt form a triangle, with a larger highstress area near the base of the bolt, and the stress values gradually decrease away from the bolt base. The area of the crushed zone also shows a similar changing pattern. Overall, the crushed zone on the profile map appears as a triangle that gradually increases with the increasing load.
3.2.2 The stress state of the nails
Taking the example of a 7layer bundled nail connection with a nail diameter of 22 mm and a nail layer spacing of 5D, the failure test was conducted. From Fig. 11, it can be observed that the maximum shear stress occurs at a position approximately 10 mm from the nail root, with a value of up to 271 MPa. Beyond this position, the shear stress rapidly decreases. Simultaneously, the maximum axial stress occurs near the nail root. The critical section for nail failure is within approximately 10 mm from the root, where failure typically occurs. At a distance of around 50 mm from the nail root, the stress direction changes, reaching another extreme point. This is due to the application of downward vertical force at this stage, and the concrete beneath the nail has already been crushed, lacking effective restraint. The stress state at this point is similar to that of a cantilever beam with one end fixed and the other end subjected to a concentrated downward force, causing compression on the lower side and tension on the upper side of the nail.
4 Parametric analysis of clustered group connections
4.1 Layer arrangement of clustered group connections
Using a bolt diameter of 19 mm as an example, Fig. 12 compares the average shear force of a single bolt under different bolt layer numbers. The increase in bolt layers results in a decrease in the average loadcarrying capacity of a single bolt, and the corresponding reduction coefficient also decreases. When the nail layers increase from 3 to 7R, the reduction ratio increases from 3.6% to 13.5%. Therefore, the influence of nail layers cannot be ignored. Figure 13 shows the variation of the unevenness coefficient for connectors with different numbers of layers. The increase in nail layers leads to a decrease in the unevenness coefficient, indicating a more pronounced uneven force distribution. With the increase in load value, the unevenness coefficient becomes larger, suggesting a tendency towards uniform loading. When the load reaches its limit, the force distribution becomes relatively uniform.
According to the provisions of the European standard (EC4) regarding shear stiffness, which is the ratio of the shear carrying capacity multiplied by 0.9 times the safety factor to 0.7 times the slip value, Fig. 12 reveals that the increase in nail layers has a significant impact on shear stiffness. Combining the above conclusions, it is evident that a few nails bear the majority of the load, leading to an overall reduction in the stiffness of bundled nail connections. Due to the premature yielding of the nail root, which bears a significant shear force in the initial stage, and subsequent internal force redistribution, the force gradually becomes more uniform, making this phenomenon particularly pronounced in the initial stage.
Table 3 quantifies the ratio of uneven force distribution to shear stiffness, using the tangent stiffness at 0.9 × 0.7P, primarily reflecting the average stiffness in the initial stage. It can be concluded that the higher the uneven force distribution, the smaller the shear stiffness. Therefore, the average shear capacity of bundled bolt connections is lower than that of singlebolt connections in the initial loading stage.
4.2 Spacing of clustered group connections
Taking d = 22 mm, a fixed number of layers as 5 layers, and C50 concrete as an example, the influence of different bolt spacings on shear bearing capacity and uneven force distribution is analyzed. Figures 14 and 15 provide a comparison of the loadslip curves and unevenness coefficients for different bolt spacings, while Table 3 presents the variation of reduction coefficients. From Fig. 14 and Table 4, it can be observed that a toosmall bolt spacing will decrease the average bearing capacity of a single bolt. When the bolt spacing is reduced from 8 to 4d, the bearing capacity of a single bolt decreases by 4%. Figure 15 shows a significant variation in the unevenness coefficient before 0.6P, and a larger spacing results in a more uneven force distribution. As the load approaches the limit, the force gradually becomes more uniform.
Table 5 illustrates the impact of bolt spacing on shear stiffness. It can be seen that shear stiffness is positively correlated with uneven force distribution. The initial uneven force distribution causes more load to be distributed to a few bolts, leading to a reduction in the average shear stiffness of the bundled bolt connection in the initial stage.
4.3 Influence of concrete strength grade
Figure 16 illustrates the variation in loadslip curves for different concrete strength grades. It can be observed that the concrete strength grade is negatively correlated with the reduction coefficient; the higher the concrete grade, the lower the corresponding reduction. Taking d = 22 mm, a bolt spacing of 4D, and a 3layer bundled bolt connection as an example, when the concrete grade increases from C30 to C60, the reduction coefficient decreases from 10.7% to 3.8%. With an 8D bolt spacing, using C30 concrete results in only a 1.3% reduction compared to C60. This implies that in engineering, not only can the utilization of bolts be improved by using highstrength concrete, but a part of the reduction in stiffness due to lower concrete strength can also be compensated for when the bolt spacing is larger.
Figure 17 shows the influence of concrete strength grades on the uneven force distribution coefficient. It can be seen that before 0.6P, the impact of concrete grades on uneven force distribution is significant, but becomes negligible when approaching the limit. In Fig. 18, taking a 5layer bundled bolt connection with an 8D bolt spacing as an example, at the ultimate bearing capacity, the principal stress cloud diagram under each concrete strength grade reveals that the crushing area for the connection using C30 concrete is 50.72% larger than that using C60 concrete. Using higher strength concrete effectively reduces the crushing area, avoiding complete crushing before the bolt shearing occurs. In summary, increasing the concrete strength grade helps reduce the main stress in concrete, decrease the crushing area, and enhance the bearing capacity of bundled bolt connections.
5 Calculation methods for bearing capacity and slip of connections
5.1 Reduction coefficient calculation
The calculation of the reduction coefficient for the group bolt effect, considering the coupling effects of bolt spacing and bolt layers at multiple levels, based on concrete strength classification, yields the shear capacity reduction coefficient. Figure 19 presents a threedimensional surface, where the Zaxis represents the shear capacity reduction coefficient, and the X and Y axes represent the bolt layers and bolt spacing, respectively, with concrete strength as a fixed parameter. The three factors listed have a significant impact on the reduction coefficient values. As the concrete strength grade increases, the surface is positioned higher in the coordinate system, emphasizing the importance of considering concrete strength as an influencing factor.
This paper conducted a multivariate regression analysis using MATLAB 2020 software to fit a formula incorporating the three factors mentioned above. Here is the definition of this formula:
In Eq. (2), x_{1},x_{2},x_{3} and serve as the three independent variables, y is the dependent variable, and a_{1}, a_{2} are unknown parameters.
The results obtained from the least squares fitting are as follows:
a_{1} = 0.0076, a_{2} = 0.0088, a_{3} = 0.0090, a_{4} = 0.0016,a_{5} = 0.0001, a_{6} = 0.0001, a_{7} = 0.7020, The residual value is 0.0085, and the error is within an acceptable range. Substituting the calculated results into Eq. (2) and simplifying, the obtained results are as follows:
In Eq. (3), it was observed that the influence of the independent variable on the result can be negligibly small. Therefore, removing this term still yields a good fit. The coefficients obtained from the refitted least squares method are:
a_{1} = 0.0076, a_{2} = 0.01, a_{3} = 0.0090, a_{4} = 0.0016, a_{5} = 0.0001, a_{6} = 0.6985,
Substituting the calculated coefficients into Eq. (3), we obtain:
The independent variables x_{1}, x_{2} and x_{3} are respectively brought into the number of bolt layers n_{r}, the spacing of the layer of the bolt n_{d}, and the compressive strength f_{cu,k} of the concrete cube, respectively, to obtain the formula of the reduction coefficient of the shear bearing capacity of the cluster group nail:
5.2 Calculation methods for shear bearing capacity and slip of clustered connection
The original loadslip curve proposed for singlenail connectors has a certain deviation when applied to the cluster group nail connectors, which will overestimate the shear stiffness in the initial stage of loading. Therefore, this section intends to refit a loadslip relationship suitable for cluster group nail connectors based on the existing research results in this paper and the loadslip curve data of various types of cluster group nail connectors. It is pointed out that the number of nail layers and the spacing of the nail layers will affect the initial shear stiffness of the cluster group nail connector, and the influence of the number of nail layers n_{r} and the spacing of the nail layer n_{d} on the loadslip curve will be considered in this section.
Taking the concrete strength of C50 as an example, combined with the loadslip curve data obtained by the number of bolt layers and the spacing of bolt layers, the calculation is carried out for many times, and it is considered that the fractional form of the Buttry formula is simple and the fitting effect is good, so the proposed formula form is as follows:
Given the initial values a = 1 and b = 1, 12 sets of typical data are substituted into (6), and the least squares method is used to fit and iterate repeatedly, and the following data are finally obtained, as shown in Table 6:
a is taken as the dependent variable, and the number of nail layers and the spacing of the nail layers are taken as independent variables, and the relationship is determined after trial calculation:
If a_{1} = 1, a_{2} = 0.11123, a_{3} = 2.666, a_{4} = 0.051, a_{5} = 2.5, then a is denoted as:
Then b is determined by ba, and through the linear relationship of n_{r}, the following is proposed:
In summary, it can be obtained that the loadslip full curve relationship of the cluster group nail connector:
Which is also suitable for 3 ~ 7 layers of bolts, 4d ~ 8d bolt layer spacing and C30 ~ C60 concrete. where: S represents the amount of slip in mm; Q represents the shear force of the nail in kN; Q_{u} is the design value of the shear bearing capacity of the nail, and the unit is kN; n_{r} represents the number of bolt layers of cluster group nail connectors; n_{d} represents the relative layer spacing of the nails, i.e., \({n}_{d}=\frac{{l}_{d}}{d}\), in mm.
This formula is applicable to the range of 3 ≤ n_{r} ≤ 7, 4 ≤ n_{d} ≤ 8, concrete strength C30 ~ C60.
5.3 Verification
The data from reference (Deng et al. 2022) was used for validation with parameters as shown in Table 7. A selection was made for 3 layers and C50 concrete with 4d to 8d spacing for the connection. Figure 20 presents a comparative graph between experimental data from Table 6 and calculated results using the proposed formula. The loadslip relationship curves, obtained by the formula provided in this paper, align well with the experimental data, showing minimal deviation. Table 8 provides the shear stiffness results for each test group along with their corresponding curves. Due to accidental factors, the data of GS2 specimen is significantly higher than that of other specimens. It can be observed that, except for GS2, the errors are within 10% for the other three groups, with a mean value of 8.22%.
6 Conclusions

(1)
The phenomenon of group effect significantly impacts the loadcarrying capacity and shear stiffness of individual bolts within bundled connections. For bolt numbers ranging from 3 to 7 in rows and 4 to 8 in columns, and with concrete strengths varying between C30 and C60, the ultimate load capacity's reduction coefficient spans from 0.781 to 0.982. This effect leads to a decrease in connection shear stiffness by as much as 50%. It is imperative for design considerations to adequately address the diminished bolt shear capacity and stiffness due to the group effect.

(2)
The root cause of the group effect lies in the uneven force distribution among bolts positioned on different layers. The load is transmitted in a stepwise manner, initially placing a greater shear force on the upper bolts because of the sequence of load transmission. The constraints imposed by the concrete's bottom surface significantly restrict bolt displacement, culminating in increased shear forces on both upper and lower bolts, while intermediate bolts experience lower forces. This uneven distribution is particularly noticeable at the onset of loading but becomes more uniform as the load intensifies, eventually leading to plastic deformation in both steel and concrete.

(3)
The decrease in average loadcarrying capacity for bolts in bundled connections exhibits a direct positive correlation with the number of bolt layers and a negative correlation with both bolt spacing and concrete strength. Similarly, the force distribution's unevenness and the reduction in shear stiffness within bundled connections are positively correlated with the number of bolt layers and spacing, and inversely correlated with concrete strength. Among these factors, bolt layers exert the most significant influence on the reduction of load capacity, with bolt spacing and concrete strength playing comparable roles.

(4)
Numerical simulations have yielded 100 sets of coefficients pertinent to the reduction in bundled connection capacities, facilitating the establishment of a comprehensive loadslip expression tailored for bundled connections. The derived shear stiffness curve demonstrates an average deviation of 8.22% from experimental values, underscoring the simulation's accuracy.

(5)
Despite delving into the mechanics of forces and group effects in bundled connections, there remains a clear need for further research. Specifically, more detailed investigations are required to quantify the group effect in the context of new concrete materials and to develop a refined slip relationship.
Availability of data and materials
Data are contained within the article.
References
Anderson D (2004) Eurocode 4 Design of composite steel and concrete structures [J]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/9783642417146_51757
Classen M (2018) Limitations on the use of partial shear connection in composite beams with steel Tsections and uniformly spaced rib shear connectors [J]. J Constr Steel Res 142:99–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.11.023
Deng WQ, Hu JW, Liu D, Zhao XB, Cha S, Zhang JD (2022) Test and calculation method of shear bearing capacity of cluster welding nail connectors [J]. China J highway Transp 35:194–204. https://doi.org/10.19721/j.cnki.10017372.2022.10.018
Ding FX, Yin GA, Wang HB (2017) Static behavior of nail connectors in bidirection pushoff tests[J]. ThinWalledStructures 120:307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.09.011
Ding JG, Zhu JS, Kang JF, Wang XC (2021) Experimental naily on grouped nail shear connectors in precast steel UHPC composite bridge[J]. Eng Struct 242:112479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112479
Fang ZC, Fang HZ, Huang JX, Jiang HB, Chen GF (2022) Static behavior of grouped nail shear connectors in steel–precast UHPC composite structures containing thin fulldepth slabs[J]. Eng Struct 252:113484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113484
GB 50917–2013 (2013) Code for Design of Steelconcrete Composite Bridges [S]. China Architecture and Construction Press, Beijing
GB/T 10433–2002 (2003) Cylindrical head welding nail for arc nail welding [S]. State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine, Beijing
Huang CP, Zhang ZX, Zheng ZJ (2015) Force characteristics and failure mechanism experimental study of group nail in steel concrete composite structure[J]. J Wuhan Univ Technol 37:100–105. https://doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.16714431.2015.02.019
Li M (2015) Study on refined calculation method and timeeffect characteristics of stud connectors of steelconcrete composite beam bridge [D]. Doctoral thesis, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Li CJ (2017) Naily on force transfer mechanism and calculation method of shear connectors of assembled composite beams [D]. Doctoral thesis, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China
Lian WR (2015) Naily on mechanical properties and design method of steelconcrete composite pylon anchorage system with steel anchor box [D]. Doctoral thesis, Chang ’an University, Xian, China
Lin ZF, Liu YQ (2015) Model experiment on sheartension interaction relation ship of headed studs [J]. China J Highway Trans 28:80–86. https://doi.org/10.19721/j.carolcarrollnki.10017372.2015.01.011
Luo YZ (2008) Research on boltnailed shear joints of steelconcrete composite beams [D]. Doctoral thesis, Central South University, Changsha China
Okada J, Yoda T, Lebet JP (2006) A naily of the grouped arrangement of nail connectors on the shear strength behavior [J]. J Struct Mech Earthquake 23:75–89. https://doi.org/10.2208/jsceseee.23.75s
Shi L (2021) Naily on the mechanical behavior of assembled discrete group nail shear key in composite beam [D]. Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing, China, Thesis
Shi L, Fan L (2022) Experimental naily on mechanical behavior of prefabricated multikey shear keys [J]. J Civil Environ Engin 44:105–112. https://doi.org/10.11835/J.ISSN.20966717.2020.194
Su QT, Han X, Ren F (2014) Mechanical properties of multirow pushout test specimens [J]. J Tongji Univ, China 42:1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253374x.2014.07.004
Tong GS. Stability interpretation of multistorey framesupport frame in GB50017–2017 "Steel Structure Design Standard" [J]. Steel structure 2019;3. https://doi.org/10.13206/j.gjg201901017.
Tong LW, Chen LH, Wen M, Xu C (2020) Static behavior of nail shear connectors in highstrengthsteel–UHPC composite beams. Eng Struct 218:110827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110827
Wang YH, Yu J, Liu JP, Chen YF (2019a) Shear behavior of shear nail groups in precast concrete decks. Eng Struct 187:73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.002
Wang JQ, Qi JN, Tong T, Xu QZ, Xiu HL (2019b) Static behavior of large nail shear connectors in steelUHPC composite structures. Eng Struct 178:534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.058
Wang W, Zhang XD, Ding FX, Zhou XL (2021a) Finite element analysis on shear behavior of highstrength bolted connectors under inverse pushoff loading. Energies 14:479. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14020479
Wang W, Zhang XD, Zhou XL, Wu L, Zhu HJ. Naily on Shear Behavior of MultiBolt Connectors for Prefabricated Steel–Concrete Composite Beams. Frontiers in Materials. 2021 8;2296–8016. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmats.2021.625425
Wei X, Xiao L, Wen ZY (2021) Research progress of steelconcrete composite bridge in 2020 [J]. J Civil Environ Engin 43:107–119. https://doi.org/10.11835/j.issn.20966717.2020.106
Xu C, Sugiura K (2013) FEM analysis on failure development of group studs shear connector under effects of concrete strength and stud dimension [J]. Eng Fail Anal 35:343–354
Xu C, Sugiura K, Wu C, Su QT (2012) Parametrical static analysis on group nails with typical pushout tests[J]. J Constr Steel Res 72:84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.029
Xu H, Zhang S, Rong B (2022) Investigation on shear behavior of nails and PBL shear connectors in steelconcrete hybrid bridge girder. Structures 43:1422–1435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.07.050
Yang F, Liu Y, Jiang Z (2018) Shear performance of a novel demountable steelconcrete bolted connector under static pushout tests[J]. Eng Struct 160:133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.01.005
Yu YL, Guo SJ, Wang LC, Yang Y, Xiang YQ (2020) Experimental and numerical analysis of grouped nail shear connectors embedded in HFRC[J]. Constr Build Mater 242:118197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118197
Zhang Q, Jia D, Bao Y (2018) Internal force transfer effectbased fatigue damage evaluation for PBL shear connector groups[J]. J Constr Steel Res 148:469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.016
Zhang J, Hu XM, Fu WJ, Du H, Sun QM, Zhang Q (2020) Experimental and theoretical naily on longitudinal shear behavior of steelconcrete composite beams[J]. J Constr Steel Res 171:106144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106144
Zhang G, Li XY, Tang CH, Song CJ, Ding YH (2023a) Behavior of steel box bridge girders subjected to hydrocarbon fire and bendingtorsion coupled loading [J]. Eng Struct 296:116906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116906
Zhang G, Tang CH, Li XY (2023b) Fire resistance of steel trussconcrete composite bridge girder. J Building Struct 44:214–226. https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2022.0260
Zhang AP (2021) Study on shear Performance of stud connectors of Steelhybrid structure [D]. Doctoral thesis, Zhejiang university, Hangzhou, China
Zhou XH, Zhi WR, Di J (2014) Nail effect and calculation method of shear bearing capacity of bolted shear connectors of steel anchor box [J]. J China Highway 27:13 JournalArticle/5b435873c095d716a4c7387e
Funding
This research was funded by Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi, grant number Program No. 2022JC23, Innovation Capability Support Program of Shaanxi, grant number Program No. 2023CXTD38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Methodology, S.W. and C.T.; validation, S.W., G.L. and Y.F.; formal analysis, J.Z., J.D. and C.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W., C.T. and J.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.W., Y.F., C.T., J.D. and G.L.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, S., Tang, C., Fu, Y. et al. Methodology for calculating load capacity reduction and slip relationship of clustered group nail connectors. ABEN 5, 7 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251024001184
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251024001184