Skip to main content

Table 2 Details of the PSC bridge girders considered (Garber et al. (Garber et al. 2016))

From: Polya urn model-based performance assessment of PSC bridges: prestress loss consideration

Beam ID

Cement content (kg/m3)

Fly ash content (kg/m3)

Coarse aggregate (kg/m3)

fine aggregate (kg/m3)

water-cement ratio

fcri (MPa)

Relative humidity (%)

Age at which prestress loss is measured (days)

Ratio

of experimental- to computed- prestress loss (RATIO)

I-1

320.4

100.9

1097.6

723.8

0.34

48.3

49

980

1.166

I-2

65

939

1.015

I-3

65

948

1.082

I-4

65

962

1.213

I-5

49

975

1.052

I-6

49

973

0.958

I-7

65

946

1.015

I-8

65

966

0.995

II-1

314.4

100.9

1168.7

777.2

0.22

45.5

49

955

2.371b

II-2

65

922

1.779

II-3

65

932

1.353

II-4

65

936

1.552

II-5

49

952

1.649

II-6

49

949

1.581

II-7

65

937

2.199b

II-8

65

923

1.598

  1. aComputed using the procedure presented in Sect 3.1
  2. bRATIOS equal to or greater than 2.0 are neglected in computing the statistics of RATIO