 original innovation
 Open Access
 Published:
Cable force estimation of cables with small sag considering inclination angle effect
Advances in Bridge Engineering volumeÂ 2, ArticleÂ number:Â 15 (2021)
Abstract
Cable force estimation is essential for security assessment of cablestayed bridges. Cable force estimation methods based on the relationship between cable force and frequency have been extensively studied and used during both construction phase and service phase. However, the effect induced by inclination angle of the cable is not included in the establishment of frequencycable force relationship as horizontal cable model is normally employed. This study aims to investigate the influence of the inclination angle on vibration based cable force estimation and provide practical formulas accordingly. Firstly numerical examples of fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables are simulated to illustrate the necessity of considering the inclination angle effect on the modal parameters and cable force estimation for inclined cables with small sag. Then practical formulas considering the inclination angle effect to estimate the cable force of fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables via the fundamental frequency are established accordingly. For the inclined cables with unknown boundary conditions, the coefficients reflecting boundary condition are predicted via the practical formulas for fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables. And the cable force considering the influence of inclination angle and unknown boundary conditions is obtained by iteration method. Finally, numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
1 Introduction
Cablestayed bridges are widely used due to their reasonable structural force, beautiful shape, mature construction methods and large span (Zhang et al. 2020). The cable is the main stressed member of the cablestayed bridge, and its health status affects the safety of the bridge. Cable damages induced by corrosion, fatigue and other reasons, may lead to bridge collapse and other malignant accidents. Therefore cable force has become one of the most important indexes for cablestayed bridge condition assessment (Ren and Hu 2009; Zhao et al. 2020; Tian et al. 2021).
Generally the cable force estimation methods can be divided into direct methods and indirect methods (Ren et al. 2005; Kim et al. 2007). The direct method refers to the direct measurement of the cable force, including the manometer method and the pressure sensor method. On the other hand, indirect method estimates the cable force by measuring indirect physical quantities, such as magnetic flux method and vibrationbased method. Vibration based method is the most widely used method for its high precision, convenient implementation and low cost. The main principle is that the cable force can be estimated by the measured frequencies according to the specific relationship between the cable force and frequency (Cunha et al. 2001). During the process of establishing the relationship between the cable force and frequency, various factors, such as bending stiffness, sag, boundary conditions, and temperature are often simplified or ignored, which would lead to nonnegligible errors in the estimated cable force (Dan et al. 2014; Chen et al. 2018).
For slender cables, the bending stiffness of the cable plays a very weak role in vibration, and its vibration basically follows the string vibration theory (Ceballos and Prato 2008). However, the bending stiffness of the short and thick cables cannot be ignored, and their vibrations are closer to the Euler Bernoulli beam (Fang and Wang 2012). If the string vibration theory was still adopted, the calculated cable force would be larger.
Three hinds of boundary conditions specific as hingedhinged, fixedfixed, and hingedfixed are normally adopted in the vibration based cable force estimation. The beam model with hingedhinged boundary conditions has definite analytical solutions, thus the corresponding cable force can be solved directly by using the cable parameters. Since there are no analytical solutions for beam models with fixedfixed and hingedfixed boundary conditions, numerical solutions are normally required (Huang et al. 2014). The concept of effective calculation length was introduced to transform the fixed boundary into the hinged boundary, then the solution for hingedhinged boundary condition could be adopted (Yan et al. 2015). Actually the boundary condition of cable is elastic embedded boundary between hinged and fixed instead of ideal hinged or fixed (Huang et al. 2015). On the one hand, the anchorage form of the cable end is complex with various degrees of elastic embedded. Interpolation method can be used to get the coefficients that reflecting the degrees of elastic embedded boundary and the cable force can be further obtained iteratively. On the other hand, in order to inhibit the large vibration and fatigue failure of the cable, dampers are usually installed at the connection location between the cable and bridge deck, which result in more complex boundary conditions and vibration performance (Yan et al. 2019; Shi and Zhu 2018).
The cable is generally arranged as a catenary due to the dead weight. The cable sag affects both the natural frequency and cable force estimation. Studies reveal that sag has a great influence on the fundamental frequency, but little influence on the even order frequencies (Zui 1996). When the cable length is long and the cable force is small, the sag effect must be considered in cable force estimation. In this case, the even order frequency can be used to improve the accuracy (Zui 1996).
The influence of temperature on cable force is mainly caused by the daily temperature range. As the thermal conductivity coefficients vary depending on the materials, the same temperature change will induce a large temperature difference among cables, beams and towers, which in turn generate a large additional internal force (Zhao et al. 2017; Feng et al. 2019; Ma et al. 2021). The cable forces of cablestayed bridges are usually designed according to the closure temperature, so the test temperature should be as consistent as possible with the closure temperature to minimize the temperature influence.
Though great efforts have been paid on various factors as mentioned above, the inclination angle effect attracts little attention. Most of the existing methods take horizontal cable model to establish the relationship between cable force and frequency, without considering the influence of cable inclination. When solving the differential equation of cable vibration, the cable force is linearly distributed along the length due to its selfweight. However, the cable force is deemed as constant in the existing horizontal cable model, which will inevitably generate errors in the solution. Besides, inclination angle will give rise to the redistribute the dead weight of the cable and further affect the cable sag. Thus the accuracy of the modal parameters and cable force estimation would be reduced. In view of this, this study will investigate the influence of inclination angle on cable force estimation for cables with small sag, and provide practical cable force estimation formulas for engineering practice accordingly. Numerical studies will be conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed practical formulas.
2 Basic theory
An inclined cable model considering the bending stiffness, inclination angle, sag, external force and boundary conditions is shown in Fig.Â 1. The inplane motion equation (y direction) of the cable can be expressed as (Ma 2017):
where EI denotes the bending stiffness of the cable, m(x) denotes the mass per unit length, T and Ï„(x,â€‰t) denote the cable force and force increment caused by the free vibration, respectively.
The sum of the displacement in the y direction is
where y(x) and Î½(x,â€‰t) denote the static deflection caused by the dead weight of the cable and the deflection caused by the vibration in the y direction, respectively. Î¼(x) denotes the deflection in the x direction, dsâ€‰=â€‰(dx^{2}â€‰+â€‰dy^{2})^{1/2} denotes the infinitesimal length, Î¸ denotes the inclination angle, and Îº denotes the bending curvature.
When the cable damping and axial component of the motion equation are not considered, the dsâ€‰=â€‰(dx^{2}â€‰+â€‰dy^{2})^{1/2} can be replaced by dx and Eq.(1) can be simplified as
where the first term is the cable force component in the y direction, the second term is the second derivative of the bending moment, the third term is the dead weight component of the cable in the x direction, and the fourth term is the inertia term. H(x) and h(t) are the cable force component in the x direction and the additional component caused by vibration, respectively. The following relationship can be found
When the sagspan ratio is less than 1/8, the H can be deemed as T (Ma 2017). In the following description, the cable force is represented by T for simplicity. By ignoring the second order term, Eq.(3) can be expressed as
Assuming the solution of Eq.(5) has the following form
where Ï•(x) and q(t) are the shape function and generalized coordinate, respectively.
The deformation compatibility equation of the cable can be established according to the geometrical and elastic relations between stress and strain (Ma 2017)
Combine Eq.(6) and Eq.(7), the motion equation of the cable is obtained as follows
As the cable force T varies along the chord line due to the influence of the inclined angle, Eq.(8) is a fourorder differential equations with variable coefficients. In this paper, the finite difference method is used to solve this equation (Mehrabi and Tabatabai 1998). The cable is divided into N segments equally with length of l in the x direction (Fig.Â 2).
The difference scheme of the function Ï•(x) is
Then the matrix form of the discrete equation is obtained for Eq.(8)
where Kâ€‰=â€‰K_{1}â€‰+â€‰K_{2}, w^{T}â€‰=â€‰{w_{1},â€‰w_{2},â€‰â€¦,â€‰w_{k}}
where.
\( S=\frac{1}{l^4}\left(2{EI}_{i+1}+10{EI}_i2{EI}_{i1}\right)+\frac{2{T}_i}{l^2} \), \( D=\frac{1}{l^4}\left(2{EI}_{i+1}6{EI}_i\right)\frac{T_i}{l^2}+\frac{T_{i+1}{T}_{i1}}{4{l}^2} \)
\( V=\frac{1}{2{l}^4}\left({EI}_{i+1}2{EI}_i{EI}_{i1}\right) \), \( W=\frac{1}{2{l}^4}\left({EI}_{i+1}+2{EI}_i{EI}_{i1}\right) \)
\( Q=S+\frac{K_{rot1}l2{EI}_0}{K_{rot1}l+2{EI}_0}V\left(i=1\right) \), \( G=S+\frac{K_{rot2}l2{EI}_{k+1}}{K_{rot2}l+2{EI}_{k+1}}W\left(i=k\right) \)
Each row in the matrix (K_{1}) corresponds to one node of the discrete cable, and k denotes the node number of the cable except two ends. EI_{0} and EI_{kâ€‰+â€‰1} are the bending stiffness of the two ends, respectively. K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰1} and K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰2} are the rotational stiffness of the two ends, respectively.
Due to the effect of the inclination, the cable forces are linearly distributed along the x direction (Ma 2017). The cable forces at the top end and bottom end are:
where T_{M} is the average of the cable forces at both ends. The cable force at any node (i) is
The nonlinear stiffness matrix K_{2} is
where.
r^{T}â€‰=â€‰{r_{1},â€‰r_{2},â€‰â€¦,â€‰r_{k}}, s^{T}â€‰=â€‰{s_{1},â€‰s_{2},â€‰â€¦,â€‰s_{k}}
\( {r}_i=\frac{s_i}{\sum \limits_1^k{t}_i^3/{EA}_i} \), \( {s}_i=\frac{y_{i+1}2{y}_i+{y}_{i1}}{l^2} \), \( {t}_i=\sqrt{1+{\left(\frac{y_{i+1}{y}_{i1}}{2l}\right)}^2} \)
The deflection curve of the cable is not a parabola as normally assumed when the influence of the inclination angle is considered. Thus it is calculated using the finite difference method according to the static equilibrium differential equation of the cable. The static equilibrium differential equation of a stay cable is:
Eq. (15) is then discretized and the corresponding matrix form is
where Yâ€‰=â€‰{y_{1},â€‰y_{2},â€‰â€¦,â€‰y_{k}}, y_{i} denotes the static deflection at the i^{th} node, mâ€‰=â€‰{m_{1},â€‰m_{2},â€‰â€¦,â€‰m_{k}}.
It should be noted that the stiffness matrix K is asymmetric due to the effects of inclination angle.
3 Influence of the inclination angle on the cable force estimation
3.1 Iterative method for cable force estimation
As the characteristic frequency equation (Eq. 10) is a transcendental equation, there is no explicit formula for the cable force. The iterative method based on frequency sensitivity can be used to estimate cable force (Kim et al. 2007; Ma 2017). As this study mainly focus on inclination angle effect, other parameters such as bending stiffness and axial stiffness, are assumed to be constant in this section. Then Eq.(10) can be transformed into
where Î¶(T)â€‰=â€‰Ï‰^{2}(T), Î¶ and w(T) are the eigenvalue and corresponding eigenvector of Eq.(18), respectively. Eq.(18) can be further translated into
The derivative of the frequency to the cable force is
The derivative of the matrix K_{1} can be easily obtained via Eq.(11). The derivative of the matrix K_{2} is
where.
\( \frac{d\left({s}_j\right)}{dT}=\frac{1}{l^2}\left[\frac{dy_{j+1}}{dT}2\frac{dy_j}{dT}+\frac{dy_{j1}}{dT}\right] \), \( \frac{d\left({t}_i\right)}{dT}=\frac{1}{2l}{\left[1+{\left(\frac{y_{j+1}{y}_{j1}}{2l}\right)}^2\right]}^{1/2}\left(\frac{dy_{j+1}}{dT}\frac{dy_{j1}}{dT}\right) \)
\( \frac{d\left({r}_i\right)}{dT}=\frac{d\left({s}_i\right)}{dT} EA{\left(\sum \limits_1^k{t}_i^3\right)}^{1}{\left(\sum \limits_1^k{t}_i^3\right)}^{2}\left(\sum \limits_1^k3{t}_i^2\frac{d\left({t}_i\right)}{dT}\right){EAs}_i \), \( \frac{d\boldsymbol{Y}}{dT}={\boldsymbol{K}}_{\boldsymbol{1}}^{\hbox{} \boldsymbol{1}}\frac{d{\boldsymbol{K}}_{\boldsymbol{1}}}{dT}\boldsymbol{Y} \)
where i, jâ€‰=â€‰1, 2, â€¦, k, and k is the dimension of the stiffness matrix. The nonlinear stiffness matrix K_{2} is related to the static deflection of the cable.
With Eq.(20), the cable force can be solved iteratively after obtaining the derivative of cable frequency. Suppose
The initial cable force is assumed to be T_{1}â€‰=â€‰T^{eva}, and the frequency Î¶_{1, c} and frequency derivative Î³_{1} can be obtained according to Eq.(18) and Eq.(20), respectively.
The frequency error Î”Î¶_{1} is
where Î¶_{m} denotes the measured frequency.
The cable force error Î”T_{1} is
Then the cable force T_{2} can be obtained as
The above iterative process is repeated until the convergent cable force value (T_{iâ€‰+â€‰1}) is obtained. It should be noted that this study mainly focuses on the effects of inclination angle on the inplane frequency and the corresponding estimated cable force. Actually the inclination angle may also affect outofplane frequency and this would be further investigated.
3.2 Numerical study
The characteristic parameters Î»^{2} and Î¾ are employed to reflect the sag and bending stiffness of the cable, respectively (Irvine and Caughey 1974). Specific as
where L_{e} denotes the effective length of the cable.
The ranges of the two parameters for more than 95% of cablestayed bridges in the world are Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰3.1 and Î¾â€‰>â€‰50 (Tabatabai et al. 1997). In other words, most cables belong to cables with small sag. This section aims to investigate the inclination angle effect on the modal parameters and estimated cable force for fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables with small sag and different bending stiffness.
Three cables as listed in TableÂ 1 are employed in this example. The parameters of Cable I and Cable II are taken from Ref. (Kim et al. 2007; Ma 2017). Cable I, Cable II, and Cable III are deemed as cables with small bending stiffness, medium bending stiffness, and large bending stiffness, respectively. The cable is divided into 100Â segments equally for analysis.
Natural frequency is an important parameter for cable force estimation in vibration based method. This section studies the effect of different inclination angle on natural frequency of hingedhinged cable. The relation curves between the frequency and the inclination angle of the three cables are obtained by using the cable vibration theory expressed in Section 2 and shown in Fig.Â 3. The marked frequency values in the figure are the frequency values of the cable when the inclination angle are equal to 0Â°, 30Â°, 60Â° and 90Â°, respectively. It can be seen that the fundamental frequency of cables with small sag (large, medium and small bending stiffness) decreases with inclination angle, and the maximum relative reduction is 8.53%. When the frequency sensitivity based method is used to estimate the cable force (Kim et al. 2007; Ma 2017), mode shape of the cable is required during the iterative process. The first order maximum normalized mode shapes of three cables with different bending stiffness and inclination angles are calculated via the above mentioned method. The results indicated that the effects of inclination angle on mode shapes of the three cables are not obvious, thus they are not exhibition here for the space cause.
As the inclination angle affects the natural frequency of the cable, the cable force estimation accuracy would also be affected accordingly. The cable force estimation results of hingedhinged cables (30Â° and 60Â°) with and without considering the inclination angle effects are compared in TableÂ 2. For the hingedhinged cable, the maximum cable force estimation error is about 10% when the inclination angle effects are not considered. The results show that the influence of inclination on frequency, mode shape and cable force estimation accuracy for fixedfixed cables is almost the same as the hingedhinged cable. The numerical examples clearly indicate the necessity of considering the inclination angle effect on the cable force estimation for inclined cables with small sag.
4 Practical cable force estimation formulas for cables with known boundary
The iterative method is not convenient for practical application as the process is too complicated. Therefore it is necessary to establish a practical formula for cable force estimation based on the fundamental frequency.
4.1 Analysis of the cable frequency and characteristic parameters
The relationship between the cable force, bending stiffness and frequency square for hingedhinged cables with different inclination angle (0^{0}, 30^{0}, 60^{0} and 90^{0}) are calculated according to the abovementioned method and shown in Fig.Â 4. It can be seen that bulge appears in the frequency of the cable with large sag when the cable force is small. With the increase of inclination angle, the bulge disappears gradually. When the inclination angle is 90Â°, no bulge can be found and obvious linear relationship can be found between the frequency square, cable force and bending stiffness. This is because the cable is not affected by the sag when the inclination angle is 90Â°, and the results conforms to the cable force estimation formula derived from the theory of hingedhinged beam. With the increase of cable force, the frequency corresponding to small sag cable is nearly flat. However, due to the influence of inclination angle, the slope of the surface is varies with inclination angle. When the cable force continues to increase, the sag effect of the cable become very small, and the influence of inclination angle can be ignored. Thus the surface at each inclination angle is close to the theoretical formula derived from the theory of hingedhinged beam.
For cables with large sag, the cable frequency first increases and then converges to a stable value with the increase of bending stiffness. It should be noted that the increase of inclination angle accelerates the convergence speed. For cables with small sag, the frequency surface of the cable increases gently. When the sag is extremely small, the bending stiffness has little influence on the frequency.
4.2 Practical formula for cable force estimation
As pointed out in Section 3.1, most cables of cablestayed bridges belong to cables with small sag (Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰3.1). According to Section 4.1, the frequency square of cables with small sage is linearly related to the cable force and bending stiffness. However, the surface slope varies with inclination angle. When Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰0.17, cable force can be calculated according to the string theory without leading to obvious error (Ceballos and Prato 2008). Thus this section aims to establish the practical formula considering the inclination angle effect for fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables with small sag (0.17â€‰<â€‰Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰3.1) based on curve fitting method.
Cable II with the parameters used in Section 3.2 is reused in this section. The dimensionless parameter Î»^{2} is restricted into the interval [0.17, 3.10] by adjusting the cable force value in Eq.(26). The interval of the dimensionless parameter Î¾ is calculated via Eq.(27) by setting different bending stiffness of the cable (Fang and Wang 2012). Details about the parameters are listed in TableÂ 3.
For the cables with large bending stiffness (0â€‰<â€‰Î¾â€‰<â€‰18), the relationship curve between cable force and frequency square with different inclination angles are obtained by using the cable vibration theory. FigureÂ 5 shows the curves with inclination angles of 0^{0}, 30^{0}, 60^{0} and 90^{0}. It is observed that the relationship between the cable force and frequency square is linear and the curve slopes are different depend on the inclination angels. Refer to the Ref. (Huang et al. 2015), a linear function between the cable force and frequency square can be obtained by using the regression analysis.
where Î± and Î² are fitting coefficients to be determined. Their values when the inclination angles are 0^{0}, 15^{0}, 30^{0}, 45^{0}, 60^{0}, 75^{0} and 90^{0} are calculated and compared in TableÂ 4. It is observed that that the coefficients Î± and Î² decrease with the inclination angle.
Suppose the function forms are Î±â€‰=â€‰a_{1}â€‰cos(b_{1}Î¸)â€‰+â€‰c_{1} and Î²â€‰=â€‰a_{2}â€‰cos(b_{2}Î¸)â€‰+â€‰c_{2}, the fitting curves of the two coefficients are plotted in Fig.Â 6. The coefficients Î± and Î² obtained by linear regression analysis are:
Thus the practical cable force estimation formula for hingedhinged cables with large bending stiffness (0â€‰<â€‰Î¾â€‰<â€‰18) and small sag (0.17â€‰<â€‰Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰3.10) can be acquired via substituting Eq.(29a) and Eq.(29b) into Eq.(28).
Following the same procedure, the practical cable force estimation formulas considering the inclination angle effect for hingedhinged cables and fixedfixed cables with small sag (0.17â€‰<â€‰Î»^{2}â€‰<â€‰3.10) can be obtained (Table 4 and Figs.7, 8, 9 and 10). The results can be summarized as
And the coefficients a_{1}, a_{2}, b_{1}, b_{2}, c_{1} and c_{2} are listed in TableÂ 5.
4.3 Numerical study
This section aims to verify the effeteness and study the applicability of the practical formulas proposed in Section 4.2 by numerical examples. The relevant parameters of the three cables here are the same as in Section 3.2.
The estimated results of the hingedhinged cable by the practical formula and the beam theory formula are compared in TableÂ 6. The results calculated by the practical formula considering the inclination angle effect achieve higher precision than that calculated by the beam theory formula. With the increase of the inclination angle, the differences between the results calculated by the two formulas decreases gradually. When the inclination angle is 90Â°, the errors of estimated cable force are both less than 1%. This is because the influence of sag on cable force estimation decreases with the increase of inclination angle, and when the inclination angle is 90Â° the cable becomes a suspension rod or suspension rope without sag. TableÂ 7 compares the estimated results of the fixedfixed cable by the practical formula and Ref. (Ma et al. 2021). The practical formula considering the inclination angle effect provides results with higher precision. Similarly to the hingedhinged cable, the differences between the results calculated by the two formulas decrease gradually with the increase of the inclination angle.
Numerical examples reveal that the practical formula for cables with known boundary proposed in Section 4.2 can consider the inclination angle effects well and achieve higher accuracy for inclined cables with small sag. It should be noted that the accuracy of cable force estimation of Cable II is higher than that of Cable I and Cable III, which is caused by the fact the practical formula is fitted by the parameters of Cable II, which manifests that the practical formula can be established according to the concerned cable when higher precision is required in practical application.
5 Practical tension estimation formula for cables with unknown boundary
5.1 Boundary effects on the cable frequency
The actual boundary condition of a cable is between the hinged and fixed, and the anchorage end of the cable always bears part of the bending moment. Therefore, the boundary conditions at both ends of the cable are assumed to be elastic embedded boundary, and the rotational stiffness at both ends is assumed to be K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰1} and K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰2}, as shown in Fig. 2. According to the classical mechanics theory, for the fixedfixed and fixedhinged beam, unit rotation at the fixed end leads to 0 and 2i (iâ€‰=â€‰EI/l) bending moment at the hinged end and fixed end, respectively. Therefore, to produce a unit angle at the elastic embedded boundary, the required bending moment is between 0 and 2i.
The three cables mentioned in Section 3.2 are retaken as examples. The frequencies of three boundary conditions (hingedhinged, fixedfixed, and elastic embedded boundary) with different inclination angles are calculated according to the cable vibration theory and shown in TableÂ 8. The rotational stiffness of the two ends of the elastic embedded boundary are equal, i.e., K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰1}â€‰=â€‰K_{rotâ€‰âˆ’â€‰2}. The different elastic embedded boundaries are set to be \( {K}_{rot}^{\hbox{'}}=0.5 EI/l \), \( {K}_{rot}^{\hbox{'}\hbox{'}}= EI/l \), and \( {K}_{rot}^{\hbox{'}\hbox{'}\hbox{'}}=1.5 EI/l \), respectively.
5.2 Cable force estimation process
Taken Cable II as an example, this section proposes a cable force estimation process considering the influence of the inclination angle and unknown boundary conditions. The coefficient reflecting the elastic embedded boundary is firstly calculated by interpolation method based on practical formulas for fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables. Then the cable force taking into account the influence of the inclination angle and unknown boundary conditions is obtained through iteration.
According to Eq.(28), the practical force estimation formulas for cables under different boundary conditions can be expressed in the same form.
where a_{1}, b_{1}, c_{1}, a_{2}, and c_{2} are coefficients to be determined according to the boundary conditions.
Given that the elastic embedded boundary is between hinged and fixed, the average of the coefficients in practical formulas for hingedhinged and fixedfixed ends (Table 5) is employed as the coefficients to estimate the cable force T_{0}, specific as
Then the estimated cable force T_{0} is substituted into Eq.(29a) and Eq.(29b) to obtain the frequencies (f_{1j} and f_{1g}) of the cable with hingedhinged and fixedfixed ends, as
The coefficients reflecting the elastic embedded boundary are obtained according to the interpolation formula (Eq.(34))
Finally the cable force (T_{1}) is calculated via Eq.(31). If (T_{1}â€‰âˆ’â€‰T_{0})/Tâ€‰>â€‰1%, the above process is repeated until (T_{i}â€‰âˆ’â€‰T_{iâ€‰âˆ’â€‰1})/T_{iâ€‰âˆ’â€‰1}â€‰<â€‰1%, and the T_{i} is the estimated cable force. Normally T_{1} can satisfy this terminate circulation condition.
5.3 Numerical study
Section 5.1 discussed the influence of boundary conditions on the frequency of cables with different bending stiffness, and Section 5.2 presented a cable force estimation method that takes into account the influence of the inclination angle and unknown boundary conditions. This section will analyze the influence of boundary conditions on cable force estimation for cables with different bending stiffness, and verify the effectiveness of cable force estimation method under unknown boundary conditions. The relevant parameters of cables are the same as in Section 5.1, and the cable force estimation processes of Cable I and Cable III are the same as that of Cable II. The force estimation results are presented in TableÂ 9, TableÂ 10, and TableÂ 11, respectively.
For the cables with small bending stiffness (Cable I), the calculated frequencies under different elastic embedded boundaries and the same inclination angle are the same, thus the corresponding cable forces estimated according to the frequency and inclination angle are identical (Table 9). The relative errors of the cables under three different boundary conditions are almost the same and less than 2% (Table 9). In other words, the boundary conditions have little influence on the cables with small bending stiffness. In actual application, the boundary conditions of cables can be treated as hingedhinged or fixedfixed for simple.
As shown in TableÂ 10 and TableÂ 11, the boundary conditions have significant influence on the force estimation for the cables with medium bending stiffness (Cable II) and large bending stiffness (Cable III). The estimation results obtained by the method proposed in this section are more accurate than that obtained by the method under hingedhinged and fixedfixed boundary conditions and the relative errors are less than 2% and 5% for the Cable II and Cable III, respectively. The boundary conditions of cables with medium bending stiffness and large bending stiffness cannot be simplified as hingedhinged or fixedfixed ends, and should be treated as unknown boundary conditions in actual application.
6 Conclusion
Horizontal cable model are normally employed in the most of the existing cable force estimation methods without considering the influence of inclination angle. This study investigated the influence of inclination angle on cable force estimation accuracy and provided practical formulas accordingly. The main conclusions are as follows:
(1) The fundamental frequency of a cable with small sag decreased with the increase of the inclination angle. Significant errors could be found when the fundamental frequency was applied to estimate the cable force without considering the inclination angle effects.
(2) The proposed practical force estimation formulas for cables with fixedfixed and hingedhinged cables could consider the inclination angle effects well and achieve higher accuracy for inclined cables with small sag. Besides, the practical formula could be established according to the concerned cable when higher precision was required in practical application.
(3) The proposed practical force estimation formulas for cables under unknown boundary conditions possessed high precision and superior practicability. The influence of boundary conditions on the accuracy of cable force estimation varied with the bending stiffness. The boundary conditions had little influence on the cables with small bending stiffness, and they could be treated as hingedhinged or fixedfixed for simple. On the contrary, the boundary conditions had a significant influence on the force estimation for the cables with medium bending stiffness and large bending stiffness, and should be treated as unknown boundary conditions in actual application.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
 CAE:

Considering Angel Effect
 EB:

Elastic Boundary
 EF:

Estimated Force
 FF:

Fundamental Frequency
 RCF:

Reference cable Force
 RE:

Relative Error
 WCAE:

Without Considering Angel Effect
References
Ceballos MA, Prato CA (2008) Determination of the axial force on stay cables accounting for their bending stiffness and rotational end restraints by free vibration tests. J Sound Vib 317(1â€“2):127â€“141
Chen CC, Wu WH, Chen SY, Lai G (2018) A novel tension estimation approach for elastic cables by elimination of complex boundary condition effects employing mode shape functions. Eng Struct 166:152â€“166
Cunha A, Caetano E, Delgado R (2001) Dynamic tests on large cablestayed bridge. J Bridge Eng, ASCE 6(1):54â€“62
Dan DH, Chen YY, Yan XF (2014) Determination of cable force based on the corrected numerical solution of cable vibration frequency equations. Struct Eng Mech 50(1):37â€“52
Fang Z, Wang JQ (2012) Practical formula for cable tension estimation by vibration method. J Bridge Eng, ASCE 17(1):161â€“164
Feng H, Liu XC, Wu B, Wu DH, Zhang XD, He CF (2019) Temperatureinsensitive cable tension monitoring during the construction of a cablestayed bridge with a customdeveloped pulse elastomagnetic instrument. Struct Health Monit 18(5â€“6):1982â€“1994
Huang YH, Fu JY, Wang RH, Gan Q, Liu AR (2015) Unified practical formulas for vibrationbased method of tension estimation. Adv Struct Eng 18(3):405â€“422
Huang YH, Fu JY, Wang RH, Gan Q, Rao R, Liu AR (2014) Practical formula to calculate tension of vertical cable with hingedfixed conditions based on vibration method. J Vibroeng 16(2):997â€“1009
Irvine HM, Caughey TK (1974) The linear theory of free vibration of a suspended cable. Proc Roy Soc Lond Math Phys Sci 341(1626):299â€“315
Kim BH, Park TH, Shin HY, Yoon TY (2007) A comparative study of the tension estimation methods for cable supported bridges. Int J Steel Struct 7(1):77â€“84
Ma L (2017) A highly precise frequencybased method for estimating the tension of an inclined cable with unknown boundary conditions. J Sound Vib 409:56â€“80
Ma L, Xu H, Munkhbaatar T, Li SF (2021) An accurate frequencybased method for identifying cable tension while considering environmental temperature variation. J Sound Vib 490:115693
Mehrabi AB, Tabatabai H (1998) Unified finite difference formulation for free vibration of cable. J Struct Eng ASCE 124(11):1313â€“1322
Ren WX, Chen G, Hu WH (2005) Empirical formulas to estimate cable tension by cable fundamental frequency. Struct Eng Mech 20(3):363â€“380
Ren WX, Hu WH (2009) Cable modal parameter identification I: theory. J Eng Mech, ASCE 135(1):41â€“50
Shi X, Zhu S (2018) Nonlinear impact of negative stiffness dampers on stay cables. Struct Monit Maint 5(1):15â€“38
Tabatabai H, Mehrabi AB, Morgan BJ, Lotfi HR (1997) Nondestructive bridge evaluation technology: bridge stay cable condition assessment. Report to the Federal Highway Administration. Construction Technology Laboratories, Inc., Skokie, IL
Tian YD, Zhang C, Jiang S, Zhang J, Duan WH (2021) Noncontact cable force estimation with unmanned aerial vehicle and computer vision. Comput Aided Civ Inf 36(1):73â€“88
Yan BF, Chen WB, Yu JY, Jiang XM (2019) Mode shapeaided tension force estimation of cable with arbitrary boundary conditions. J Sound Vib 440:315â€“331
Yan BF, Yu JY, Soliman M (2015) Estimation of cable tension force independent of complex boundary conditions. J Eng Mech, ASCE 141(1): 06014015
Zhang X, Peng JY, Cao MS, Damjanovicâ€™ D, Ostachowicz W (2020) Identification of instantaneous tension of bridge cables from dynamic responses: strict algorithm and applications. Mech Syst Signal Pr 142:106729
Zhao WJ, Zhang GW, Zhang J (2020) Cable force estimation of a longspan cablestayed bridge with microwave interferometric radar. Comput Aided Civ Inf 35:1419â€“1433
Zhao YB, Wang ZQ, Zhang XY, Chen LC (2017) Effects of temperature variation on vibration of a cablestayed beam. Int J Struct Stab Dy 17(10):1750123
Zui H, Shinke T, Namita Y (1996) Practical formulas for estimation of cable tension by vibration method. J Struct Eng ASCE 122(6):651â€“656
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to the constructive comments by the anonymous reviewers.
Funding
The study is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51878234 and 51778204), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. JZ2019HGPA0101), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (No. KQTD20180412181337494).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Authorsâ€™ contributions to this work are shown below: WenYu He: Methodology, WritingOriginal Draft. FanCheng Meng: Numerical Analysis. WeiXin Ren: Conceptualization, WritingReview & Editing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisherâ€™s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
He, WY., Meng, FC. & Ren, WX. Cable force estimation of cables with small sag considering inclination angle effect. ABEN 2, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251021000378
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43251021000378
Keywords
 Cable force estimation
 Inclination angle
 Boundary condition
 Frequency