Skip to main content

Table 2 Selected ground motions for the code-compatible spectrum representing the design level of 2%-50 years

From: Probabilistic seismic response analysis of coastal highway bridges under scour and liquefaction conditions: does the hydrodynamic effect matter?

#

Earthquake event

RSN

Mw

R (km)

Scale factor

1

Kern County, 1952

15

7.36

38.89

2.83

2

San Fernando, 1971

68

6.61

22.77

2.24

3

San Fernando, 1971

70

6.61

27.40

2.48

4

San Fernando, 1971

78

6.61

28.99

2.73

5

Tabas_ Iran, 1978

138

7.35

28.79

3.27

6

Irpinia_ Italy, 1980

286

6.90

21.26

2.92

7

Coalinga-01, 1983

322

6.36

24.02

1.73

8

Coalinga-01, 1983

324

6.36

43.68

3.64

9

Coalinga-01, 1983

335

6.36

31.62

2.60

10

Coalinga-01, 1983

337

6.36

29.34

2.98

11

Coalinga-01, 1983

339

6.36

29.38

2.00

12

Coalinga-01, 1983

340

6.36

27.67

3.13

13

Coalinga-01, 1983

341

6.36

38.95

2.12

14

Coalinga-01, 1983

345

6.36

31.21

2.09

15

Coalinga-01, 1983

346

6.36

29.94

2.39

16

Coalinga-01, 1983

350

6.36

37.02

3.56

17

Coalinga-01, 1983

351

6.36

30.07

3.59

18

Coalinga-01, 1983

359

6.36

26.38

1.95

19

Coalinga-01, 1983

360

6.36

29.12

3.64

20

Coalinga-01, 1983

363

6.36

32.17

2.82

  1. Note: RSN-Record sequence number in the PEER West2 Strong Motion Database; Mw-Magnitude; R-Source distance